Golden Retriever Dog Forums banner

Light Colored Golden Recommendation

25K views 49 replies 14 participants last post by  annef  
#1 · (Edited by Moderator)
Dear Golden Retriever Forum,

I hope this post finds you well and healthy. I understand that Light Colored Golden Retrievers are looked unfavorably upon in this forum and that one should always select health over color.

Nonetheless, I am aware that "cream" or "light colored" is a relatively common coat color found in the Golden Retriever Breed and the Breed has a broad spectrum of golden color coats ranging from extremely light to extremely dark. I also understand that there is European Bloodlines and American Bloodlines.

Can someone recommend a reputable breeder who is known to breed lighter colored Golden Retrievers either in the United States or Canada. I am willing to go to Canada and import the dog (with rabies clearance and all).

Of course, I want to prioritize the health of the Golden Retriever and ensure him or her has all the OFA clearances. I want to reiterate that I am open to all colors for the sake of longevity and health, however, if I could have a preference "cream" or "light colored." Still, I want a healthy puppy we can welcome to our family, enjoy morning walks on the beach, snuggles in the winter, and so much more :) that will live for 11-13 years (and hopefully longer with teeth maintenance, annual vet visits, a lean/healthy diet, and exercise/entertainment).

Also, I understand that the lists for puppies are very very very long. I am willing to wait till 2022 or 2023 for a puppy!

Thank you so much in advance. If you could be so kind, please post only relevant to this topic. I understand that many have an "unfavorable" view of light colored goldens here. 🐶

I have referenced:
Canadian Breeders:
 
#2 ·
I hope this post finds you well and healthy. I understand that Light Colored Golden Retrievers are looked unfavorably upon in this forum and that one should always select health over color.
I hope you will find that the issue on this forum is not with "light colored golden retrievers". It is with breeders who are using marketing buzzwords to extract higher prices for their goldens. Arguably worse, the marketing hype is typically compounded by the fact that many of these breeders are using dogs imported from eastern Europe with questionable (and, often, unverifiable) health backgrounds.

With that said, there are many breeders who have goldens that trend to the lighter end of the spectrum. So, if you're willing to wait for a well-bred golden, you shouldn't have any real issues.
 
#3 · (Edited)
This thread is probably going to give you the best/most comprehensive list of breeders to investigate: Ethical "English Creme" breeders

Also, if you tell us what state/area you live in someone might be able to provide more specific suggestions (I'm assuming from your name it's Michigan? ;) ).
 
  • Like
Reactions: CAROLINA MOM
#4 · (Edited)
You had asked about pictures. Here's a thread with pictures of Kona. She is not an "English Cream" (nor "Creme" 😅), but she is on the lighter-end of the spectrum of colors for a golden. Kona is registered in the AKC registry as a "light golden", but I much prefer our veterinarian's description of "champagne". 😁

As an FYI, I have been told that you can get an idea of adult coloring by looking at the tips of a puppy's ears. This seems to have held true for Kona. Since you seem interested in the lighter colors, and goldens' coats tend to darken as they mature, this might be information you can use.
 
#5 · (Edited)
Thank you all for the recommendations. This is the first post of many....when we get our newest family member (eventually 2022/2023/2024), I will ask about grooming, food, and best practices. I think far too often people do not meet the needs of their dogs, like simply brushing their teeth!

I have found Halia Goldens [Florida] (Robin in a member of the forums; she seems to breed with dogs from the Netherlands, UK...), Blackpool [Canada], Eden Kennels [Canada], and Kyon Kennels [Canada].

Any advice on how to contact the breeders? Many look overwhelmed by the high volume of inquiries. I don't want to overwhelm them even more...maybe better to wait till the pandemic is over. Gee... COVID really made things hard in a bunch of expected and unexpected things.

I am based in Southern California. Should I contact the GRCLA? Any other leads?
 
#7 ·
@Prism Goldens Thank you for your advice! I am going to wait a little contact Robin. She seems very very overwhelmed by requests as her website states: "Our waiting list is full for the next 2 years. Please do not inquire about availability. We're sorry for the inconvenience."

@SoCalEngr Beautiful pictures of Kona! What a happy pup! I'll note the ears, but not a huge deal.

@pawsnpaca Thanks for the link to another similar post. I looked at some of those albeit some are hard to find or look like they are no longer breeding. I am based in Southern California.

Thank you to all!
 
#8 ·
This board definitely doesn't have any problem with light gold goldens. This board has a problem with unethical breeders who use buzz words like "english cream/creme" to describe their dogs, which far too often come from unhealth tested pet quality animals, and they charge obscene prices while not adhering to the COE. So do not worry that you would be frowned upon for wanting or having a light gold golden here, just choose one from someone who follows ethical breeding practices.
 
#14 ·
Because you're based in Southern California, you're fortunate to have a lot of reputable breeders in your own backyard. Now, granted, I'm not really sure what you mean by light golden - it looks like you might actually mean cream without being called cream because of the links to pages featuring nearly cream/white dogs? The range of colors for goldens is so varied that I myself am imaging a golden honey, in which case a lot of California puppies are this color. I like to refer to them as the California blondes (like my little guy).
 
#19 ·
Because you're based in Southern California, you're fortunate to have a lot of reputable breeders in your own backyard. Now, granted, I'm not really sure what you mean by light golden - it looks like you might actually mean cream without being called cream...
There is no such thing as a cream golden. Goldens are Light gold, gold, and dark gold only. So he is properly referencing his desire as a light gold.
 
#15 ·
I also have Goldens with European pedigrees. My recommendations, other than Halia, would be Kyon, Star Crowned (my girl’s sire was bred by Karen), Darrowby, Coppermoon, Kernow, My Way (this is my breeder/co-owner but I think she has a full waitlist) Beau Geste, Overlook, and Eastshore. Avoid any breeder who uses the term “English cream/creme” — reputable breeders of English type dogs don’t do that. EDIT: Also check out Colorbook. They produce some very nice light gold dogs.
 
#17 ·
@gr56 @Emmdenn @goldielynn

Thank you for all the recommendations. Yes I am based in SoCal though have ties to the beautiful state of Michigan.

I am looking for our first puppy to be white or creme colored and introducing a second golden retriever (any gold color) two to three years later (after the 1st is out of his/her puppy phase).

So for now both recommendations are super helpful, but prefer white / creme. Though I want to reiterate that health is a priority! and I am aware that claims "English" types being healthier are simply false. We just thought having two different colored goldens would be unique!
 
#21 ·
Just curious then what people refer to as golden retrievers with white color coats? Not golden retrievers?

Golden Retrievers are known to possess a wide range of colors from a very pale gold / white to a dark amber. Though "gold" is the primary coloring for this breed.

I don't see anything wrong with having a preference from a responsible breeder (i.e. Eden Kennels or Kyon Kennels). As long as the dogs are responsibly breed (and have OFAs/genetic testing ) + an owner is responsible about diet, vet visits, teeth cleaning, exercise, and visiting an eye doctor once older + a whole lot more, I see no fault in breeders who have goldens towards one end of the spectrum.

Yet at the end of the day, these dogs are true companions and a superb breed regardless of color. I don't think (at least from my perspective) color is a disqualifier. Bad breeding is! Just my two cents...


882360
 
#25 ·
Just curious then what people refer to as golden retrievers with white color coats? Not golden retrievers?

Golden Retrievers are known to possess a wide range of colors from a very pale gold / white to a dark amber. Though "gold" is the primary coloring for this breed.

I don't see anything wrong with having a preference from a responsible breeder (i.e. Eden Kennels or Kyon Kennels). As long as the dogs are responsibly breed (and have OFAs/genetic testing ) + an owner is responsible about diet, vet visits, teeth cleaning, exercise, and visiting an eye doctor once older + a whole lot more, I see no fault in breeders who have goldens towards one end of the spectrum.
Megora's post really says it. I was a bit confused when I came here as to the tensions over color too. Mostly because I had never been exposed to a poorly bred, not to standard Golden before. I learned a lot about what is out there from this forum.
The standard is there for a reason. If you look at other breeds, you will see that when people start pursuing a color, the breed often starts to suffer. Aussies suffer because people want Merle and will do unethical double Merle breedings, and it's started to happen more and more in Border Collies too. Labs have suffered from color pursuits too, bring up a Silver lab in a room full of Lab people and see what happens there. There are some awful color things happening with bulldogs too that has the breeders upset too, understandably.
Sadly with Goldens, the latest "fad" that seems to be going around is people wanting "english cream" dogs. People are trying to breed for a color now, and often not health, not the standard. I see people on FB posting every day with their "EC" golden that is so far out of standard it isn't even funny, weighing 90lbs and a female 24.5" tall looking more like a Pyrenes etc. That isn't a what a Golden is supposed to be. If you love Goldens, love them for they are supposed to be per the standard. (In truth, at their outset they were almost all what is called "dark gold" and these days people are so familiar with the blond gold shade that they now accuse dark gold dogs of being mixed with Irish Setters!) They truly are the best dogs and I cringe to think that they'll end up ruined by so many unethical breeders out there seeking to line their pockets by selling badly bred "white dogs" to people.

There is nothing wrong with having a liking for a certain shade, so long as it's is a shade that meets the GR standard. My 2 goldens are very different. I have a 3 and 9 (from your photo). I didn't pick either of them based on color. They are very different from each other, and they are both the BEST dogs and I love them so much, I don't even think for a second about their color.
 
#23 ·
Goldens aren’t truly white. Various shades of gold. Both of my dogs are light gold, though my boy is registered as “golden”. You can see that the are majority light golden with darker gold points, and will continue to darken as they age. Reputable breeders of European type Goldens won’t use the term “English cream” and will refer to their dogs as light good. The breeders who call their Goldens “white Goldens” just don’t know the standard and are incorrectly calling their dogs white, when in actuality it’s a pale shade of gold. Nothing wrong with having preference!

(you can see that against the white snow, it’s clear these aren’t white dogs)
882369


882370


882371
 
#24 ·
The breeders who call their Goldens “white Goldens” just don’t know the standard and are incorrectly calling their dogs white, when in actuality it’s a pale shade of gold. Nothing wrong with having preference!
Many of them are also deliberately breeding dogs who are outside breed standard though when breeding dogs who are not exactly a shade of gold. I know the "compare to snow" or "compare to a piece of paper" excuses, but have seen dogs in person who look more like setters or pyrs than goldens because of coloring.

If you see a pyr or a setter - and they are not the same shade of white as snow or a piece of white paper, do you call them golden?
 
#26 ·
Color fads will always be a thing. This isn’t new. Woman I worked with was telling me “well I have a RED golden, reds are smaller and they’re more agile than the big fluffy ones”. As we all know red is also an unacceptable shade too.

The bottom line is that reputable breeders don’t breed for color. European pedigrees tend to be more medium to light shades of gold. I was literally standing next to two Irish red & whites at a show today with my girl who is light gold. There would be absolutely no question that she’s a light colored golden, and they were Irish red and whites. You look at shows in Europe and in Canada.....Goldens of all shades, light gold included, do very well, color does not determine the quality of the dog. And BTW my Canadian friends involved in Goldens think it’s absolutely nuts how hung up on color people are in the states. Seriously.
It is absolutely asinine to claim color has anything to do with the quality of the dog. Either you have a nice dog, or you don’t.

I’ve seen FAR more poorly bred dogs in my area that are varying shades of gold to even dark red than I do poor quality light colored dogs. That’s not to say that I haven’t been absolutely awful light colored dogs either, because I have, but the whole color debate is just so silly to me. It’s old. People who cry and complain about color constantly just perplex me, who gives a hoot if someone prefers deep red dogs or light gold dogs. If a breeder is breeding reputably and also happens to produce a dog leaning to the “too pale” or “too deep” end of the color spectrum, who cares? Like seriously, why do we care so much? I’d rather an utterly correct light colored dog than a medium gold dog with a weak front. This photo clearly shows the range of shades of gold, as well as two different breeds demonstrating the incorrect ends of the color spectrum.You really can’t see the difference between a pure white sammy and the light golden next to it???

People will continue to produce deep red dogs and extremely pale dogs because a lot of people like them. Doesn’t mean it’s correct, also not anything new.
882373
 
#29 · (Edited)
Sorry to start tensions (if I did) and that was never my intention. Just trying to learn.

I really do understand that there needs to be a breed standard for competition and show dogs. But for loving families of the dog, who will meet the dogs needs at every point of its lifespan, I think we all could be tolerant of light colored (with European pedigrees) and darks. Of course, with a responsible breeder and not a puppy mill.

I am just a prospective owner (with lots to learn) and seeking out a responsible breeder, but more importantly a healthy dog that I can provide the best quality of life for. IMHO if an owner, within its financial means, cares and meets the dogs and truly supports them and they have good to excellent health clearances, then there shouldn't be an issue.

Sometimes I wonder if the GRCA would look to its counterparts in Europe or Canadian and accept the light goldens?

But what do I know? Not a breeder or anything like that. I am just looking for a puppy that will enjoy being a part of my family and giving him/her the best life he or she can have. That is my true intention.
 
#30 ·
I really do understand that there needs to be a breed standard for competition and show dogs. But for loving families of the dog, who will meet the dogs needs at every point of its lifespan, I think we all could be tolerant of light colored (with European pedigrees) and darks. Of course, with a responsible breeder and not a puppy mill.
Breed standards are not just for shows.

They define the breed and set the type.

It's why people who know this breed can spot a golden at a glance.... and spot what ISN'T a golden at a glance.

It's why we don't have dogs with blue eyes or spotted or liver coats. It's why we do not have dogs with white coats.

It's why the golden temperament is what it is.

It basically is why we do not have 26" dogs or 13" dogs.

It is why these dogs weigh a very specific weight range.

If a breeder does not know the breed standard or is deliberately breeding for attributes outside the breed standard, that's a big shame.
 
#33 ·
I read the disclaimer on English Cream Goldens on Kyon's website just out of curiosity. The breeder is echoing much of what this thread is saying and about what many on this forum say: good breeders don't breed for color, English cream dogs don't live longer than their American counterparts, and that there's no such thing as an English cream GR. All good things!

However, they do remark that their litters come in many shades of gold, from very light to rich gold (this is also very similar in normal golden litters as well) -- there's room for a lot of variation in any given litter. Except for Windsor's litter -- all in his litter of 9 were the exact same shade of honey golden (or whatever coat color he falls under, not getting into semantics). But I digress, going with Kyon could leave you in the unenviable position to possibly turn a puppy chosen for you because of coat color? I would encourage you to broaden your restrictive stance on what color dog you'd like when you finally do settle down with a breeder.
 
#37 · (Edited)
Golden retrievers originate from the UK. The UK Kennel Club standards say Goldens should be Cream, Gold and Golden.

I can’t get my head around the cream debate. I didn’t choose a cream puppy, I came across a wonderful breeder who bred his puppies for temperament and health. I can trace my puppy’s Kennel Club lines as far back as there are records.

I understand it may be different in the US, and it will depend on who is breeding them. I don’t,
however, understand the colour bashing when the colour is actually acceptable in the country the breed originates from. This is a screen shot from the UK Kennel Club.

I know not everyone has a problem with lighter Goldens, but I’ve seen a few comments implying they are inferior, or even not a true Golden Retriever if they have a lighter coat.
I personally love Goldens in all their wonderful colours!

882382
 
#38 ·
Golden retrievers originate from the UK. The UK Kennel Club standards say Goldens should be Cream, Gold and Golden.

I can’t get my head around the cream debate. I didn’t choose a cream puppy, I came across a wonderful breeder who bred his puppies for temperament and health. I can trace my puppy’s Kennel Club lines as far back as there are records.

I understand it may be different in the US, and it will depend on who is breeding them. I don’t,
however, understand the colour bashing when the colour is actually acceptable in the country the breed originates from. This is a screen shot from the UK Kennel Club.

I know not everyone has a problem with lighter Goldens, but I’ve seen a few comments implying they are inferior, or even not a true Golden Retriever if they have a lighter coat.
I personally love Goldens in all their wonderful colours!

View attachment 882382
I agree. And that golden people in Canada and the UK find the color debate to be totally absurd. They come in all shades of gold, from very light to very dark. Yes we have breeders here who purposely breed for the very pale or very dark colors, that’s an issue on its own because those types of breeders often forego health testing and choosing dogs for color rather than structure or temperament. But there are also byb and puppy mills of every shade and type of golden imaginable, so the blanket statement of hate against pale gold dogs is just ridiculous. The quality of the dog is so much more than the shade of gold of its coat.
 
#41 · (Edited)
So...do people get confused when a single color has different names in different countries?

If I say brown, a Spaniard will say marrón, a Dane will say brun, a Finn will say ruskea, a Croat will say smeđa, a Czech will say hnědý. Now here is where it gets interesting ask a Portuguese speaker from Europe for the color brown and it will be castanho. Ask for that same color form a Portuguese speaker from Brazil and you will get marrom. That is I believe the crux of the whole “Cream” color debate for those breeders who are reputable and are not trying to breed white dogs.

Yes, both the UK and US a speak English but they are not identical. We have differences and divergences on how we use the same language in lots of different ways. For example I would say let me pull the suitcase from my car’s trunk. That would be confusing to someone in the UK because they don’t call their cars container area a trunk, they call it the boot. If a person from the UK came to the United States and asked for a biscuit they would be very disappointed.

All of these slight differences in the language that we share, cause confusion and I think that’s exactly what we see here. The US breed Standard truely is not very different at all from the UK version but the language differences do create confusion. The US breed standard does allow for a color of dogs that is very light - it is called light golden. That same color in the UK and in Canada is also included in their standard but they use the term cream. Light Golden = Cream. It is the same color just using different terms very much like those two Portuguese speakers who use two different words for the same color brown.

Now you do have people in the US who are breeding specifically to get as far away from the breed standard color as possible. To get as close to white as is possible. In all breed standards regardless of where they come from the color white is purposely excluded. In the US when we see repeatedly breeders who are trying to breed specifically for a color that should not and literally can not exist in this breed, along with the awful lies and lack of health Certifications...yeah, the word cream has a very negative connotation to those of us who do care about the breed in the US.

I’ll be honest I actually have a physical reaction (negative) when I hear a person in the US use the word cream to describe their golden. But when I am talking to someone who lives in Canada or Europe or Australia that term does not bother me at all. That’s because this color in that country is the same color as dogs in my country that are light golden. Breeders in Canada, Europe and Australia are not saying the word cream as kind of a bait and switch for really meaning as white as I can possibly get this dog.

As for buyers, I don’t know how to combat this. I think very differently about dogs than they do. I think they see colors like a paint job. Like a blue Honda Civic is the same as a grey Honda Civic. From that standpoint I do see how we get to the thoughts of “what’s the big deal” or “Why am I getting a hard time about a color preference” or “I know this forum is bias against pale dogs”. I don’t see it as paint though. The dogs in the US bred for color are nearly always missing critical other points in the standard. Because a breeder is purposely breeding outside the standard in one way (targeting white) they often deviate away in many. That standard is the blue print for a Golden so if a breeder doesn’t care about up holding the standard the dog on paper will be a Golden but the actual animal may no longer really have much in common with the breed. No breeder can focus on a single trait to the exclusion of all else and not see incredible negative impacts on other traits, because color is not simply Mother Nature’s paint.

Thought experiment - You be the breeder
You have to choose which parent dogs to breed together to make your puppy
The main breeding Axiom: There are no perfect dogs.

If something is unmentioned, please assume it is the positive option and shared by all dogs.
Example: I did not specifically mention Ichthyosis so assume all have been tested and all are negative (they don’t carry any bad copies of the gene).

Potential momma
Your female dog was imported from Eastern Europe sight unseen. She is so pale that everyday Joe’s you run into call her White. She is over two and has passed all her health certifications. She has been working on her CGC with the dream of doing therapy work. She has had some struggles with the walking through a crowd, reacting to distractions when it is dropping things and the supervised separation. You feel if her personality where a bit bolder these would not be an issue. You don’t know much about structure but you do see that her front two paws would point to 10 and 2 on the clock and while 10/2 might be okay for driving hands it doesn’t look comfortable on your girl’s feet.

Potential Dads (all are fictitious but similar to what is found in real life)

1. Medium Gold in color from an American based pedigree, overall structure is great. He doesn’t have any titles himself but he does have all the appropriate health certifications. His owner says he has a great temperament but a friend has shared that this dog has a streak of protection she did not like. You go to visit and see no temperament issues displayed. He is close and affordable to use.

2. This is very pale, almost white dog that was imported from Eastern Europe. His structure leaves a lot to be desired and looks like he may have health issues as he ages from the lacks in his structure (fiddle front, cow hockey, sway back, etc.) This dog has no titles and is missing health certifications or they where not done correctly (too young or not by the appropriate specialist). He never leaves his property so there is no one to ask about his temperament but his owner and they say it is great. You go to visit and this dog seems timid and doesn’t make eye contact. The owner just says, “look how calm he is, he always makes very calm puppies”. He is close but more expensive than dog number one.

3. A dog who is light Golden and has a blended pedigree. He is impressive in his titles as he has an AKC Championship along with several obedience titles. He has all of his health certifications as do the generations behind him. He has what looks to be lovely structure although he might be a bit smaller in height that you were hoping. The owner describes this dog as one that will never be a couch potato but has a good off switch. You visit and the dog is lovely but you do see that this dog is more active in general than the other two. He is further away and because he will be going out to shows you may have to do an AI breeding. If he is at home, the cost would be comparable to dog 2 but if he is out showing the need for an AI will increase your costs.

4. A very pale dog that currently lives in a bordering country he was imported from the UK. He is impressive in his titles as he is a Champion in his country as well as having a hunting title and a therapy designation. He has all of his health certifications as do the generations behind him. He has what looks to be lovely structure although you would have liked a bit more substantial legs. His owner describes him as her heart dog, a lovely boy who is game for anything she wants to try. There will not be the opportunity to meet him in person but his owner is happy to send photos, videos or anything else you need. The stud owner will require that you sell all puppies on spay neuter contracts and that only a puppy you keep in your own name solely will be allowed to have full registration. His cost is comparable to dog 2 even after needing to do an AI.

5. A very pale dog, even a little lighter than your girl and is of European lineage. His structure could be better and he has the same issue with his front feet that your girls does, perhaps even a bit worse. This dog has an IABCA International title but when you ask about how he did, the owner says, “He showed well but was always last place behind two American looking dogs. I think the judge just wouldn’t look at pale dogs.” This dog does have a therapy designation. He has almost full certifications except his heart was not tested by a Cardiologist. You ask if the owner would be willing to retest but they decline saying none of his 100+ puppies have ever had any issues. His owner says his temperament is great. You go to visit and this dog seems fine but you realize he is being kept separate from all the other dogs. You ask to see him interact with another dog but they only give excuses. You do see him catch sight of another dog, he gives that dog a hard stare and his heckles raise. He is close and the most expensive but they will waive the fee for two puppies out of the litter.

Which stud dog would you choose?
What stud dog do you think a color focused breeder in the US would choose?
 
#42 · (Edited)
All of these slight differences in the language that we share, cause confusion and I think that’s exactly what we see here. The US breed Standard truely is not very different at all from the UK version but the language differences do create confusion. The US breed standard does allow for a color of dogs that is very light - it is called light golden. That same color in the UK and in Canada is also included in their standard but they use the term cream. Light Golden = Cream. It is the same color just using different terms very much like those two Portuguese speakers who use two different words for the same color brown.

I’ll be honest I actually have a physical reaction (negative) when I hear a person in the US use the word cream to describe their golden. But when I am talking to someone who lives in Canada or Europe or Australia that term does not bother me at all. That’s because this color in that country is the same color as dogs in my country that are light golden. Breeders in Canada, Europe and Australia are not saying the word cream as kind of a bait and switch for really meaning as white as I can possibly get this dog.
Laura, I appreciate much of what you say in your post.... the only thing is that I do somewhat think that the word "cream" meant something quite different when it was added to the breed standard than it means now - all around the world. Today what it apparently means to many people is a color as close to white as possible, or with as little color as possible.

I was reading elsewhere today - while trying to figure out where I read about the Kennel Club standard being revised to include "cream" dogs, that somebody pinpointed the 50's as the point when the coloring got really light.... but I don't agree with that. I've always believed that the term "cream" was more of a margarine or even light "butter" shade of golden right up through the 90's. It seemed to be the 2000's+ that we saw a turn towards that term meaning something more like what we see with Pyrs and Kuvasz (both being white breeds).

882393


882394


^^^ For example, this is what a "cream" looks like with a different breed (cutest thing in the whole world that dog).

I honestly am ambivalent if people want dogs that at a glance look like a different breed altogether - same thing with breeding goldens that are 40 pounds and so red they are brown. But when you have folks thinking that goldens come in more than one color (white, gold, red), you gotta ask people to check the breed standards and know it's just 1 color there....! :)