Yeah. As stated, we are completely new to this and found a breeder with good reviews online. We put down the deposit. It is what it is. I make no apologies for not knowing what are the appropriate steps past trying to make sure they aren’t part of a mill, which they are not.You put down a deposit before asking questions?
What could possibly go wrong now?
Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
So I was able to find the mother on the OFA. Heart and elbows say Normal. Hips say “mild”. Not sure what that means. And there was no OFA number attached.Per their Facebook paige, mom has OFA certs for elbows and heart. You x-ray hips and elbows at the same time. If I'm a betting man, mom failed her hips.
Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
Mild dysplasia. You don't get an OFA when you fail hips.So I was able to find the mother on the OFA. Heart and elbows say Normal. Hips say “mild”. Not sure what that means. And there was no OFA number attached.
So is this identifying the hereditary likelihood (potential to pass on)? Or the actual presence of dysplasia?Mild dysplasia. You don't get an OFA when you fail hips.
Ethical breeders don't knowingly go on to breed dysplastic dogs.
Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
Yes, the mom has hip dysplasia.I assume this means she has/will get it. And it’s likely to be passed on.
Welcome to the site. I am also a newly minted owner of a golden retriever, and went through many of the same things you are likely to go through. I had researched (off-and-on) golden retrievers over the course of two (2) years. I learned more about what I should have done in the month after we found a breeder/puppy than in the entirety of those two years (okay, a bit of hyperbole, but you get the idea).Yeah. As stated, we are completely new to this and found a breeder with good reviews online. We put down the deposit. It is what it is. I make no apologies for not knowing what are the appropriate steps past trying to make sure they aren’t part of a mill, which they are not.
I appreciate the welcome!Welcome to the site. I am also a newly minted owner of a golden retriever, and went through many of the same things you are likely to go through. I had researched (off-and-on) golden retrievers over the course of two (2) years. I learned more about what I should have done in the month after we found a breeder/puppy than in the entirety of those two years (okay, a bit of hyperbole, but you get the idea).
First, define what you are looking for. If "price" is a main consideration, then you're looking at the wrong breed and asking for help on the wrong site. Goldens have a well-documented history of health issues, and the emphasis on OFA certifications and hip/elbow/eye/cardiac clearances by those on this forum reflects their commitment to giving a GR puppy the best chance at avoiding these issues. Not a guarantee, but "best chance". And, from my experience, that is going to mean a lot of careful research (on the part of the breeders) on health histories, "test breedings" to check for genetics, etc.
As for what you should be asking, the answer can be as complicated as you want to make it. The bare minimum is either registered names or the AKC #s for the sire/dam of the litter-in-question. With this information, you can look up on K9Data and OFA to verify clearances are in place and the dogs are of proper age to be bred. Also, K9Data will allow you to create an account and do a "test breeding" to get things like coefficient-of-inbreeding, etc. As you've already discovered, folks on this forum will also help you do some checking, provided you have registered names or AKC #s.
Beyond that, you really should do some basic Google-foo. This might not be a bad place to start. There are also many resources and threads on this site, as well.
As you may have gathered, the consensus on this forum is that you should do all this before picking a breeder, much less putting down a deposit. As others have already noted, there are health issues with at-least-one of the litter's parents, and this increases the odds that puppies from this litter will also have health issues. From my understanding, the ideal would be to go back multiple generations (min 3, desired 5-or-more?) without any health issues (i.e., all certifications in place).
Good luck...
Is dysplasia a risk in Goldens? Absolutly, and that is why breeders test. We have been testing Golden for Hip dysplasia for decades now and since it is not a simple recessive gene issue we have made Substantial improvements in the risk factor by testing dogs. Is every Goladen bound to have hip dysplasia? No. Based on OFA testing results it is about 20% Risk on average. Now those are OFA tested dogs so the numbers are very likely skewed lower since the chances are very severely dysplastic dogs may not have been submitted since diagnosis is easy for severe dysplasia. Also the source of dogs tested is very likely skewed to responsibly bred dogs who are less likely to produce this issue.I mean this puppy is likely going to have hip dysplasia anyways based on breed and size. Does this really, really make that much of a difference?
That’s what I struggle with. I don’t know the answer.
At least it's not a puppy mill, right?You can bet if the bitch is dysplastic and the breeder is breeding anyway, she doesn't have the good reputation you think she does, OP. It's way too big a risk for any ethical breeder to take.
Welcome to the club. There are many people who are "nice people". They are friendly, their dogs seem well-cared for, etc. The comments are not saying they're not "nice people". Some "don't get it". Others "don't care as much". The folks on these forums tend to both "get it" and "care greatly".I guess maybe it’s just that we spent the better part of a year looking up and meeting with breeders and we finally found one that had a good reputation and seemed to breed because she cared.
And then to find out the OFA stuff isn’t up to speed. It’s a little sad. And that’s on us, I get that. We were so concerned with making sure the puppies and their parents were well cared for, that we didn’t take genetics into account.
When I chose to not go with a breeder, it wasn't about whether that specific puppy was going to have health issues, or not. It was about "do I want to encourage a breeder to continue breeding puppies that have a higher-than-necessary risk of health issues?" I don't, and I chose to give my money to a breeder who was more conscientious about not breeding dogs that did not have a solid health background.But also, I guess maybe I just struggle with the genetics in the first place. If everything else is in order and this person does good by her dogs, and the people that have adopted from her (who we interviewed) all have great things to say, is a dog with good elbows, a good heart (maybe not cardiologist certified) and a bum hip really the deciding factor to eliminate them from consideration?
I mean this puppy is likely going to have hip dysplasia anyways based on breed and size. Does this really, really make that much of a difference?
If you did the check on OFA, you can click on "vertical history" (see below), and it will let you review certifications (by each category) going back three generations. Also, if you have the AKC #s for the dam and sire, there are many folks who'd be willing to give you an opinion on the prospects for the litter.So I have begun looking at our back up breeder who was very willing to provide the dam and sire names. I looked them up.
The sire looks good but I don’t know how to check his family. Lots of records tho.
The dam only has hips and elbow. Eyes were just done. Lots of family records too. No heart though.
How do I approach this now? How do I check family lineage. Do I make a big deal
About no Heart?
This one seems leaps and bounds better than the last. But apparently there are still issues?