I am so blown away that people have nothing better to do than hurt people they don’t know, who are truly trying to make a difference. Why don’t you focus your energy onto shutting down on-line scam artists, puppy mills, dog slaughterhouses and the like.
Vail Ranch Goldens is 5 stars rated with no complaints from ANY of our clients. Why would a breeder 3,000 miles away write such horrible things about a company they have never spoken too, met or even purchased a puppy from? After contacting our attorney, they did research and connected these people to a past employee who was terminated for not living up to their high dog care standards and was asked to leave. Because they signed a non-disclosure, they personally could not post negative comments. It was clear that they had someone they knew start this malicious post. Their attorney has sent seize and desist letter to have all the slander and defamation post be deleted as there was no facts backing up their claims.
What blows my mind is that we strive every day to go above and beyond to make sure our dogs are family raised on a 5-acre ranch free to run, swim and paly all day and never put in cemented and chain-link kennels. They are surrounded by over 20 volunteers and staff, family and friends and have so much fun and love every day. As clearly shown on our Facebook page daily. Vail Ranch Goldens.
Every client that comes to our personal home/Ranch, gets a private consultation and are shown all AKC, OFA’s, Genetic and DNA test results and a performance from their Advanced and VIP trained dogs before they financially commit. So obviously none of their families had guns put to their heads or any concerns at the time they signed their health guaranteed contracts and took a puppy home. Then there is all the follow up reviews with nothing but rave reviews. Desert Moon Stella Rose has had her OFA on hips, elbows and heart with all positive results.
I ask that anyone who has posted here or has any ill will towards our company, contact me directly and ask before assuming. We just launched Vail Ranch Goldens less than 2 years ago and already are one of the most in-demand Breeder/Trainers in Southern California. We are even being asked to have our puppies and dogs in national Hollywood projects.
Feel free to visit our Facebook page @ Vail Ranch Goldens for daily and weekly updates, client reviews and the such before judging anyone’s opinion again.
So, prefacing this with my new disclosure : I don't post anything that cannot be substantiated.
Your first paragraph- answer is because to those of us who are GR preservationists, there is no real difference between a person who does not adhere to the Code of Ethics and the other less-thans you list. All the same in my eyes- none of them have the breed's interest at heart. And nothing I read in this thread is an opinion- the posts are verifiable facts. No one was attempting to 'hurt' you- everyone was attempting to give the puppy person accurate info ,since accurate info was not readily available on your site full of smoke and mirrors.
Because you 'just launched ' 2 years ago, the research done prior to 'launch' was lacking. If it was not, then education was lacking. One of the two. Among other things, good breeders desire a depth of clearances in their bitches and look for same in the stud dogs they hire (hiring is a key as well, as you cannot possibly own the best dog in the country/world for all your girls).
Here is one of your girls:
https://www.ofa.org/advanced-search?f=sr&appnum=2036225 Please click on it and read along w me, I will tell you what I and everyone else w more than 2 years in Goldens sees there: I see preliminary hip and elbows. Preliminary ortho clearances are not to be bred on, just to look-see, but she has already had at least one litter and I think two... and these are Fair prelims.. I also see an inadequate cardiac clearance- a practitioner clearance is laughably useless for a Golden imo .. and I see no eyes. Eyes should be done yearly and sent to OFA for verification and listing.
I see her sire appears to have failed his elbows, and her dam has no clearances whatever. Before I move along to the grandparents, please click on the sire's name. That will take you to his page.
There, I see fully half the tested offspring his sire has produced failed hips. Immediately, with Fair prelims, I would be concerned that Stella may not pass her finals even though she got prelims... because the finals will be under the scrutiny of three ortho specialists instead of one, as in prelims. I'm also curious at this point if Kassi Roo failed her prelims ...dk, but she too had at least one litter and I see nothing re: her. And one offspring seems to have failed elbows. As well, half his dam's offspring look to have failed elbows. At this point, you might be wondering if she is a good breeding risk. I hope you are. Since she appears to be on her second litter, that is a lot of risk you have put out there for the families who love their puppies and should be able to trust their breeder.
There is more. For any good breeder, that's just the teeny tiny tip of the iceberg on the research one should be doing. One should NEVER be breeding with no knowledge to speak of, and on prelims.
And as Eric said, perhaps you are all bent out of shape because we here criticized your breeding program. If Goldens are important to you in ways other than the pocketbook, you ought to be taking notes on how to improve it. The Code also addresses how to treat others and I believe we all follow it. We don't post inaccuracies, we try not to throw emotion in it. IMHO (opinion) you'd do well to go back and read each sentence in this thread from last year and correct whatever is criticized so that you would be breeding more ethically. Read all the informationals posted there too. LJACK worked hard on making them so that just about anyone can understand them.
So, that brings me to the other thing I was curious about in your post- this:
"Why would a breeder 3,000 miles away write such horrible things about a company they have never spoken too, met or even purchased a puppy from? After contacting our attorney, they did research and connected these people to a past employee who was terminated for not living up to their high dog care standards and was asked to leave. Because they signed a non-disclosure, they personally could not post negative comments. It was clear that they had someone they knew start this malicious post. Their attorney has sent seize and desist letter to have all the slander and defamation post be deleted as there was no facts backing up their claims."
I call bull on that one.
I do not believe you contacted an attorney, or even if you did, I do not believe they did CSI level research that uncovers 'connections', nor do I believe you have an employee that signed a non-disclosure (why would you require this? that's suspicious on it's own but I am having a hard time following your tense changes so ...) who was 'connected' to one of us....
All posts in this thread contain facts pointed out re: your "company's" lacks as far as what is accepted as safe breeding goes. There's an actual 'how to' in the Code of Ethics!! Everything criticizing your program is accurate and no amount of 'phone calls to discuss' as you suggest would change a single one of them unless you decided to put on the brakes w the breeding and start doing things more safely for your buyers and the puppies. This has nothing to do with concrete kennels. Some of the very best breeders have concrete kennels. Puppy-mill extraordinare often do not...
All you have done here is provide more impetus to uncover more fabrications and elusions. Come back when you want to do the right thing. Someone will help you.
Puppy people post here to have someone uninvolved lay out the genetic risk for particular litters. That's a good thing. And easy enough to assess- we don't care if your dogs are the cat's meow- we can only point out the lacks or plusses in your breedings with the information that's readily available. For instance, on your girls Kassi Roo and Stella Rose, I used BOM bucks to fill in their pedigrees on k9data. How about this- you go into k9data and put all the rest of your dogs there. Accurately. No silliness like '9X CH titles' or whatever- just the facts.
So that you understand, K9data is our breed's historical register. To be entire, we also have the GRCA Yearbook, but that is for dogs titled and in pedigrees with titles. K9data is user input data, so not 100% all the time but we do have fabulous monitors who take silliness out when they see it and then lock the dog if it persists.
If you want to PM your dogs' reg info to me, I would happily take the time to make them records there and then you could put in photos if you like. Using k9data does not make a good breeder -but using it does show that the breeder uses all the tools we have to do good research. You could do test breedings if the dogs were in the database. It's be easier to see risk that way. I bet right now (opinion) you are thinking to yourself something along the lines of 'why would I send her my reg info? Is she crazy?'....(back to fact) well, no I am not. I make k9data pages every day of the week. This breed is important to me, and regardless of how ethical a breeder is, if a dog is bred, the dog needs to be in k9data. Actually, most of the dogs I input are from marginal breeders/pedigrees, those are the people who do not know k9data is available for everyone. Years from now when you are dead and gone it will be important to others who have your dogs' offspring to be able to track back. So whether I believe you or not on the lawyer thing, and whether I respect you or not, I do think it is owed to your puppy people and to the breed to have a k9data record... and I am willing to invest the time if you send me the reg info. Just like I invested the dollars in Kassi Roo and Stella Rose pedigrees. I've got others on my list for this month such as Desert Moon Lexi, mentioned here (from your site):
"We are excited to announce that we have a brand new litter of AKC Champion bloodlines both sides of 1/2 European English Creams and 1/2 American Standards born January 20, 2019. Parents are Desert Moon Lexi and Jester 1x "
So, Jester IX- he's lacking a sufficient cardiac exam and he has no eye clearance on OFA. His parents both appear to have failed elbows. There are ZERO CH in 5 gen on him. So that bit is untrue also, and may be untrue on Lexi, don't know till I get her pedigree this month. And Lexi- she hasn't got the first clearance. How in the world you think you are doing such a great job, when you publish inaccuracies right and left (remember, you do state you do full OFAs on your site) and breed animals on preliminaries, post logos for competitions you haven't got the first idea how to begin to enter the world of (Master National- really?) and you have the gall to come here and complain about your hurt feelings? How are you any different from any run of the mill puppy producer?
Why have the Master National logo on your page if not to trick buyers into thinking you have high level competition dogs? The intent to deceive.. always a curious thing to me. Why?
Why not try to be the BEST YOU CAN? Transparency is so important, especially in a breed with health issues.
According to your webpage, all your breeding animals have full OFA clearances on your website. We have earlier pointed out that they do not. Why does your site make such a claim of health when it is inaccurate? Anna Princess of Cremes, for another example- nothing but hips. Did she fail elbows, and you bred her anyway? No heart no eyes? You do see that this contradicts what you state on your site?
I'm sorry you, like others whose programs were peer reviewed to be lacking, are upset. I would suggest to you to do some real research and at least starting today begin to follow the Code in your breedings. I'd also suggest you clean up the website and make it transparent and not a sales tool. Try to see it as your piece of history, something that represents you well and honestly. When you are dead and gone do you want a bunch of meaningless and untrue hype as your legacy or do you want a real picture of who you are and what you have done?
IF you truly want to be a good breeder of Goldens, there is much work to be done. I'm happy to help you, as are most of the people here who have the Golden Retriever interest at heart. Your post is such a fabulous example of 'what you don't know'.
And just for the record- so that we have it for the day someone has time to research :
"Please watch for puppies coming available from our girls:
AKC Zoe (red), AKC Butters, AKC Logan's Little Buttercup, AKC Anna Princess of Creams 100% English Cream Champ, AKC Desert Moon Kassi Roo 100%English Cream Champ, AKC Desert Moon Stella Rose 100% English Cream Champ, AKC Desert Moon Lexi 50% American 50% English Cream Champ
*Stud Services Now Available*
Sires:
AKC Sonic The Hedge Dog (red), AKC Jester IX (red), AKC Desert Moon Dozer English Cream, AKC Desert Moon Ranger English Cream
(National Field Champion on Pedigrees) AKA Champion English Cream Olaf"
and notes for that day someone wants to do some research, here are the dogs, bitches left undone.
Pedigree: Jester IX Jester IX,
https://www.ofa.org/advanced-search?f=sr&appnum=1963246
No AKC REG ON DOG NAMED SONIC THE HEDGE DOG
Dozer-
Pedigree: Desert Moon Bulldozer https://www.ofa.org/advanced-search?f=sr&appnum=1926873
Ranger-
Pedigree: Desert Moon Ranger https://www.ofa.org/advanced-search?f=sr&appnum=1977098
Olaf-
Pedigree: Int. Ch. Lake Country Chadwick's Thevenet Dely Amore' https://www.ofa.org/advanced-search?f=sr&appnum=1710768 He's not an AKC CH as she might have meant to state in her promo for upcoming litters- unless there is some off the wall group called AKA I don't know about at my advanced age.