Joined
·
8,164 Posts
For those of you that train utility work, what method to you use to do go-outs? What do you find to be the pros and cons of that method?
Every one of my dogs was taught a different method. With a new puppy that I'll be starting on go outs soon, I need to decide what I'll do with him.
My first dog, Annabel, was taught a nose touch. Conner was taught to retrieve a treat pouch hidden on the stanchion. Colby will do both the treat pouch or a paw touch, depending on what I tell him to do when he gets out there. So with Flip I will use either retrieve the treat pouch, retrieve a dowel, paw touch, sit on a mat, or some other way I haven't thought of yet.
I spend a lot of time watching top handlers train at matches and comparing it to how they do at shows. This is what I've observed: dog trained to do a touch or sit on mat are more likely to stop short. Dogs trained to get food off the gate are more likely to sniff before stopping.
What I like about the touch based method is that if your dog stops short in a trial, you can just tell them to go touch. If your method is based on them going out to get something, it won't be in the ring for them to get so you can't really do anything in that case. But I find that a dog is less likely to stop short in the first place if he has a higher motivator out there than a touch.
So confusing!
Every one of my dogs was taught a different method. With a new puppy that I'll be starting on go outs soon, I need to decide what I'll do with him.
My first dog, Annabel, was taught a nose touch. Conner was taught to retrieve a treat pouch hidden on the stanchion. Colby will do both the treat pouch or a paw touch, depending on what I tell him to do when he gets out there. So with Flip I will use either retrieve the treat pouch, retrieve a dowel, paw touch, sit on a mat, or some other way I haven't thought of yet.
I spend a lot of time watching top handlers train at matches and comparing it to how they do at shows. This is what I've observed: dog trained to do a touch or sit on mat are more likely to stop short. Dogs trained to get food off the gate are more likely to sniff before stopping.
What I like about the touch based method is that if your dog stops short in a trial, you can just tell them to go touch. If your method is based on them going out to get something, it won't be in the ring for them to get so you can't really do anything in that case. But I find that a dog is less likely to stop short in the first place if he has a higher motivator out there than a touch.
So confusing!