Golden Retriever Dog Forums banner

Generations in Dog Sports

2013 Views 68 Replies 19 Participants Last post by  ArkansasGold
I listened to a new podcast this morning and thought it was an appropriate conversation for this forum. The topic was discussing millennials in dog sports and was at least partially prompted by the Showsight article that really painted millennials in a rather unflattering light. I linked both below:



So I'll pose the question that the article did "Where is our next generation of dog people coming from"? The article pretty much implied that millennials should be skipped and all efforts should be focused on those younger than us. Thoughts?
  • Like
Reactions: 1
41 - 60 of 69 Posts
Gen X checking in.. born 1971.. I am on the newer side of dog sports and so far just conformation. When I met my wife 15 years ago her Mom has bred and shown Collies for many years, then we had our daughter that is a third generation Collie person that has been around the Conformation side and going to dog shows since she was a baby. She started handling in Pee Wee around 6-7 years old and started Juniors at age 9. She will be 13 this weekend and she eats, sleeps and breathes dog shows. She is working towards becoming a Handler. It was me that introduced the family to Goldens about 4 years ago but we are learning more and more about the breed with a great amount of help and knowledge I have gained here. The nice thing about being around Collies is that we have an endless knowledge base and most of our close friends have been breeding for many years so we can pretty much finish a Collie in a few shows. We have learned that Goldens are so much tougher to finish than a Collie but we are enjoying the challenge so far.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Make it 4! Firmly Gen X over here!

I do hunt training, and was doing tracking, but honestly for me, it's a time thing. I have to work around my non-traditional work schedule and the fact that I am a 60-90 drive from training grounds. I am counting the days til retirement. Most of the people I train with are 5-10 years older than me (in hunt and tracking), though we did have a younger contingent coming up in hunt training (until our trainer moved away). I'm not sure what has happened with the younger bunch - they seemed to be in their 30s, I'd say.

Once I am retired, I definitely plan to try agility (which is honest-to-goodness thanks to Christine and the videos she has posted here!) and maybe obedience. Will always do hunt and hopefully will get back to tracking soon.
It was 2 hours to the training place for me. Then he retired from hunt training and sold the property. There's another place that's only about 30 minutes from me, but they only train on Wednesday morning. So it's time and location for me. There's a nice, mowed field 2 blocks from my house to train land retrieves but no place to train water. Sportsman's club doesn't allow dog training in the warmer months.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I smiled when I read this. My sport is agility and I'm in Canada, not the US, so my experience may not be representative. But I truly think the inter-generation misunderstandings go both ways.

Case in point, there's an ongoing discussion within our sport about whether or not bitches in season should be allowed to compete in trials (they are currently banned from trial sites). There are a lot of handlers with intact males who think their dogs may be distracted by the presence of BIS. In agility, distraction equals danger (falling off the dogwalk, hitting a jump wing at high speed, etc.). Other distractions such as food in the ring and squeaky toys around the ring are strictly prohibited, and opponents of the new measure think BIS should be treated in the same way since they are just as distracting to some dogs as squeaky toys are to others. However, there are a lot of younger people in the sport, mostly women, who are in favour of allowing BIS at trial sites based on "gender discrimination" grounds (it's unfair to ban dogs just because they're females). (Yes, I know, but it is what it is ...) Anyway, one of these people, a millennial who has been very vocal in support of allowing BIS, posted a comment in the group discussion to the effect that "we just have to wait for the old brigade to die off or leave the sport and take their "boys will be boys" attitude with them, then we can do what we want".

To cut a long story short, she got a history lesson. The "old brigade" is my generation, the very first one to rise up collectively against the "boys will be boys" attitude in the workplace and fight for the changes that she and her peers have benefited from. If ever there was a generation that doesn't think "boys should be boys", it would be mine (just ask my kid). The millennial in question just didn't know - she assumed. Well, she knows now. It came as something of a surprise to her. And equally surprisingly, it turns out she's not really in favour of allowing BIS at trials, she simply wants a way for them to be allowed at international team tryouts and that option hadn't been included in the association's survey. So we both learned something just because we took the time to talk to one another ...
Millennial here and very anti-BIS at trials (and I own a bunch of them). Yet I know many MANY 50+ year old women who are very vocal on FB about allowing them.

I think we just all need to stop generalizing that each generation feels or acts or behaves a particular way when it comes to dogs and dog sports.
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Millennial here and very anti-BIS at trials (and I own a bunch of them). Yet I know many MANY 50+ year old women who are very vocal on FB about allowing them.

I think we just all need to stop generalizing that each generation feels or acts or behaves a particular way when it comes to dogs and dog sports.
It’s completely unfair to males to allow them at trials. Instinct is instinct. Those are also the people who blame the birch owner when a male breaks into their home to breed.
It’s completely unfair to males to allow them at trials. Instinct is instinct. Those are also the people who blame the birch owner when a male breaks into their home to breed.
I think it depends on the dogs though...

If you show in conformation, you know there will be girlies in full season sometimes at shows. Heck, people have bred dogs at shows too. o_O

The way to handle it is using stuff on the dogs noses to keep them from smelling the girlies, etc...

But otherwise, it's not too crazy from the conformation perspective.

If conformation dog shows can run smoothly with anywhere from 1000 to 2000 intact dogs and you've got little kids handling some of the dogs in juniors, but even regular classes. And so on.... without incident.

And as I've said before - my first obedience trials as a teenager, I remember going out into the obedience ring outside.... which was literally the next outside ring over from the conformation stuff. This was also back when obedience entries were as big or bigger than today.... and there was more crossover from conformation to obedience (back then the obedience instructors would literally tell people to show their obedience dogs in puppy classes (conformation) just to give them positive ring experience + socialization! <= this was before limited registration + before AKC opened the door to mutts, so it was more expected that if you had a purebred dog with papers, they could show AKC conformation.

I get what the ladies are saying above about "AH bad idea!" about having girlies in season at agility or obedience stuff and the moment people try equating dog rights with womens rights, I'm not having any of that. But you could definitely throw it out there that if a dog is aggressive towards other dogs, there should be no excuse for it.

The bitches in season bans annoy me because I have a friend who basically had the club kick her out of classes for a whole month because as long as her girl was in season, there were people using her dog as an excuse for their dog not being trained enough to ignore distractions like that. <= I remember the day and situation, because the person's dog was going after any dogs near him including mine (who was not a conformation dog, but was unfazed by any smells).
See less See more
If conformation dog shows can run smoothly with anywhere from 1000 to 2000 intact dogs and you've got little kids handling some of the dogs in juniors, but even regular classes. And so on.... without incident.
you can't show a bitch in season in Juniors.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
you can't show a bitch in season in Juniors.
I know, but you can show intact boys in juniors.
Re: BIS in the ring. My girl recently went into season for the first time at 15mo in April. I had her entered and she was doing ringside with a pro.
It was horrible timing, she was at peak receptivity and would ovulate soon, but all was relatively well. She was crated next to the boys the first day with only minor whining. The second day, she stayed in my car because the handler had another BIS using the crate.
For group, she was positioned between two bitches. The worst that happened was a poodle special thought he was going to make Beezer Doodles, but otherwise it was fine.
However, there was care with her placement and she was with people who are used to dealing with this. I can see obedience being an issue if she had to sit anywhere or agility if she accidentally peed in the ring or when sitting at the start line.

When we got home from the show, Felix was absolutely insane for 3 days, the first being the worst. He didn’t sleep, he didn’t eat, he just cried and cried and cried. And he’s never been bred, it is worse with boys who have.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
In Brooksville this year, I wanted to show Jamie ONE DAY to ONE JUDGE and she was DAY THIRTEEN of her season.
I had both Bally and Brix entered as specials...I showed bally and my friend who is a pro handler showed Brix. I've done this many times, Brix is fine being handled by someone else even with me in the ring with his dad.
Jamie got Winners Bitch. Friend #2 handled her in BOB.

BRIX
LOST
HIS
MIND

BARKING and carrying on IN THE RING THE WHOLE TIME with a pro handler showing him...because of Jamie.

Granted it was HIS GIRL but this is the kind of baloney you can expect with BIS in the ring with intact males. It's the WORST.

EVERYONE showing a male in conformation, if they catch wind of a BIS in the ring, is like GET OVER THERE in the corner and DON'T COME OVER HERE.

It's not "no big deal."
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
This past season we were at a Specialty and my daughter was in the ring with her bitch in season and I was in with my male special and he was losing his mind, it was the worst I have seen him almost to the point where I was ready to excuse myself. He would not take his eyes off her going around no matter what. It was a mess... lol
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I think it depends on the dogs though...

If you show in conformation, you know there will be girlies in full season sometimes at shows. Heck, people have bred dogs at shows too. o_O

The way to handle it is using stuff on the dogs noses to keep them from smelling the girlies, etc...

But otherwise, it's not too crazy from the conformation perspective.

If conformation dog shows can run smoothly with anywhere from 1000 to 2000 intact dogs and you've got little kids handling some of the dogs in juniors, but even regular classes. And so on.... without incident.

And as I've said before - my first obedience trials as a teenager, I remember going out into the obedience ring outside.... which was literally the next outside ring over from the conformation stuff. This was also back when obedience entries were as big or bigger than today.... and there was more crossover from conformation to obedience (back then the obedience instructors would literally tell people to show their obedience dogs in puppy classes (conformation) just to give them positive ring experience + socialization! <= this was before limited registration + before AKC opened the door to mutts, so it was more expected that if you had a purebred dog with papers, they could show AKC conformation.

I get what the ladies are saying above about "AH bad idea!" about having girlies in season at agility or obedience stuff and the moment people try equating dog rights with womens rights, I'm not having any of that. But you could definitely throw it out there that if a dog is aggressive towards other dogs, there should be no excuse for it.

The bitches in season bans annoy me because I have a friend who basically had the club kick her out of classes for a whole month because as long as her girl was in season, there were people using her dog as an excuse for their dog not being trained enough to ignore distractions like that. <= I remember the day and situation, because the person's dog was going after any dogs near him including mine (who was not a conformation dog, but was unfazed by any smells).
There's some HUGE differences between conformation and obedience. All dogs are on lead in conformation. They are right beside their handler the entire time. In obedience, they are being asked to do complex exercises off lead, away from their handler. I'm already asking a lot of my boy without asking him to ignore his instincts. Can he run obedience at a show? Absolutely! But I choose to put him in that situation on that day. You can't just rub some junk on the nose of a Utility dog and expect him to qualify. He NEEDS his nose!

All the clubs I've been to have policies about BIS. Yes, It sucks when you have to leave your girl at home for 3 weeks. That's life if you have an intact girl.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
In Brooksville this year, I wanted to show Jamie ONE DAY to ONE JUDGE and she was DAY THIRTEEN of her season.
I had both Bally and Brix entered as specials...I showed bally and my friend who is a pro handler showed Brix. I've done this many times, Brix is fine being handled by someone else even with me in the ring with his dad.
Jamie got Winners Bitch. Friend #2 handled her in BOB.

BRIX
LOST
HIS
MIND

BARKING and carrying on IN THE RING THE WHOLE TIME with a pro handler showing him...because of Jamie.

Granted it was HIS GIRL but this is the kind of baloney you can expect with BIS in the ring with intact males. It's the WORST.

EVERYONE showing a male in conformation, if they catch wind of a BIS in the ring, is like GET OVER THERE in the corner and DON'T COME OVER HERE.

It's not "no big deal."
Exactly.
Granted it was HIS GIRL but this is the kind of baloney you can expect with BIS in the ring with intact males. It's the WORST.
The cases where I've seen a problem, its been the situation you describe where the dogs "know" each other. Otherwise, have been in tight situations where I'm waiting to go back into the ring and there's people with the girlies in season who smell WONDERFUL to all the boys and it's not like they can teleport from the barn to the ring without weaving through the crowds between. The dogs are trained or managed. Like I said, up to 2000 dogs or more at some of these shows and they are not killing each other because there's breeding smells around! LOL.

And like I said - I remember plenty of shows where conformation and obedience weren't miles apart on the fairgrounds like they are today. Can we ever go back to that when obedience people need pristine silence, pristine conditions, etc or hell to pay to whoever distracted their dog.....?
BIS is a hard no for me.

I have intact males & intact females. I do sports where the dogs are off lead and as mentioned once in utility, they need their noses do some of the tricks to lessen the scenting ability is a no-go.

As an aside, beyond the distraction of BIS, especially when they are in primetime window, there is an increased potential for fights...male to Male, female to female and female insisting male listen to her NO.

Plus very worst case scenario (remember in obedience, rally & agility the dogs are off lead and potentially at a distance from their handler) a tie happens. Have both dogs had their brucellosis test? Who is responsible for any resulting vet bills either from fights, pregnancy etc.

Having to sit out 3-4 weeks of events is part of having intact girls and something I personally am fine with. It protects my girls and is really a small price to pay..

I rarely to never attend a combined conformation & obedience trial. I just don't need that particular potential conflict & stress :)
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
The cases where I've seen a problem, its been the situation you describe where the dogs "know" each other. Otherwise, have been in tight situations where I'm waiting to go back into the ring and there's people with the girlies in season who smell WONDERFUL to all the boys and it's not like they can teleport from the barn to the ring without weaving through the crowds between. The dogs are trained or managed. Like I said, up to 2000 dogs or more at some of these shows and they are not killing each other because there's breeding smells around! LOL.

And like I said - I remember plenty of shows where conformation and obedience weren't miles apart on the fairgrounds like they are today. Can we ever go back to that when obedience people need pristine silence, pristine conditions, etc or hell to pay to whoever distracted their dog.....?
I don't know when you started in obedience but I have never seen obedience with pristine conditions nor do people expect that .... everyone trains for distractions. 99% of trials are more than one ring.

However, a BIS is a completely different distraction that is a hard no.
As others have said in obedience dogs are off leash and you can not put anything on their nose to mask the smell....doesn't work in Utility.

I don't think any of us would want to even do Novice stay with a BIS surrounding our boy.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
If conformation dog shows can run smoothly with anywhere from 1000 to 2000 intact dogs and you've got little kids handling some of the dogs in juniors, but even regular classes. And so on.... without incident.
(...)
I get what the ladies are saying above about "AH bad idea!" about having girlies in season at agility or obedience stuff and the moment people try equating dog rights with womens rights, I'm not having any of that. But you could definitely throw it out there that if a dog is aggressive towards other dogs, there should be no excuse for it.

The bitches in season bans annoy me because I have a friend who basically had the club kick her out of classes for a whole month because as long as her girl was in season, there were people using her dog as an excuse for their dog not being trained enough to ignore distractions like that. <= I remember the day and situation, because the person's dog was going after any dogs near him including mine (who was not a conformation dog, but was unfazed by any smells).
The dogs are trained or managed. Like I said, up to 2000 dogs or more at some of these shows and they are not killing each other because there's breeding smells around! LOL.
(...)
And like I said - I remember plenty of shows where conformation and obedience weren't miles apart on the fairgrounds like they are today. Can we ever go back to that when obedience people need pristine silence, pristine conditions, etc or hell to pay to whoever distracted their dog.....?
The BIS issue I mentioned in my original post on the topic is at agility trials. You can't equate agility with conformation. They just aren't comparable. In agility, the dogs are off-leash, often at a distance of 40 or 50 feet from the handler, performing complex exercises at speed, including jumping over obstacles and sprinting across a 12-inch-wide plank that is 4 feet from the ground. Distractions create an obvious safety issue: I've seen dogs break their legs falling off the dogwalk, for example. And in agility, if the dog makes a mistake because it's distracted, you can't just set up again and start over. You get one shot, and that's it.

I do get that, as time goes by, competitors are becoming increasingly demanding with respect to the competitive environment. But in agility, nobody is asking for pristine conditions. We train our dogs to compete in spite of nearby screaming children, moving vehicles, flapping tents, loud conversations, barking dogs and so on. Until now, however, what I would refer to as instinct-based distractions (BIS, food in the ring, squeaky toys in the warm-up area, etc.) have all been banned. That's why it's so illogical to me that our association would decide to allow BIS at trials, since they trigger one of the strongest instinctual reactions a dog can have. And they're not even requiring the BIS to wear panties in the ring. IMHO it's more than a simple training issue. It's creating a safety hazard and means that the playing field is no longer level for intact males.

It's up to the clubs to decide whether or not they will allow BIS at their trials, and you can bet that, moving forward, I'll be choosing trials that opt not to allow them.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 3
The BIS issue I mentioned in my original post on the topic is at agility trials. You can't equate agility with conformation. They just aren't comparable. In agility, the dogs are off-leash, often at a distance of 40 or 50 feet from the handler, performing complex exercises at speed, including jumping over obstacles and sprinting across a 12-inch-wide plank that is 4 feet from the ground. Distractions create an obvious safety issue: I've seen dogs break their legs falling off the dogwalk, for example. And in agility, if the dog makes a mistake because it's distracted, you can't just set up again and start over. You get one shot, and that's it.

I do get that, as time goes by, competitors are becoming increasingly demanding with respect to the competitive environment. But in agility, nobody is asking for pristine conditions. We train our dogs to compete in spite of nearby screaming children, moving vehicles, flapping tents, loud conversations, barking dogs and so on. Until now, however, what I would refer to as instinct-based distractions (BIS, food in the ring, squeaky toys in the warm-up area, etc.) have all been banned. That's why it's so illogical to me that our association would decide to allow BIS at trials, since they trigger one of the strongest instinctual reactions a dog can have. And they're not even requiring the BIS to wear panties in the ring. IMHO it's more than a simple training issue. It's creating a safety hazard and means that the playing field is no longer level for intact males.

It's up to the clubs to decide whether or not they will allow BIS at their trials, and you can bet that, moving forward, I'll be choosing trials that opt not to allow them.
But here is the crazy thing - have been at shows which have agility trials + obedience trials + conformation all in the same building and using the same grounds, camped out in the same grooming sections, etc..
I don't know when you started in obedience but I have never seen obedience with pristine conditions nor do people expect that .... everyone trains for distractions. 99% of trials are more than one ring.
I started out in the late 90's.

But here is the thing - my first few AKC trials were outside, on grass in rings next to conformation rings. To get to the obedience rings you went through the same crowds that the conformation dogs went through, etc..

Same trials (meaning same clubs) over time got more and more selective about where the obedience rings were allowed to be. Started out away from the show rings and kinda in the grooming area. Then people complained about the noise from the dryers, etc.... and obedience rings were moved to the opposite end of the building. People complained about the noise from the agility dogs (in the same area) and spectators, and obedience rings were moved into a ballroom down a hall, etc.... People complained the room was too warm and dogs weren't doing well on the plastic sheets/tarp laid out on the floor to protect the carpet... <= and fast forward to today, no more obedience trials for these clubs.
But here is the crazy thing - have been at shows which have agility trials + obedience trials + conformation all in the same building and using the same grounds, camped out in the same grooming sections, etc..
And the handlers made that decision to show there knowing that. Over the past few years, I haven't been able to make it to the obedience trials being held at conformation shows.
I started out in the late 90's.

But here is the thing - my first few AKC trials were outside, on grass in rings next to conformation rings. To get to the obedience rings you went through the same crowds that the conformation dogs went through, etc..

Same trials (meaning same clubs) over time got more and more selective about where the obedience rings were allowed to be. Started out away from the show rings and kinda in the grooming area. Then people complained about the noise from the dryers, etc.... and obedience rings were moved to the opposite end of the building. People complained about the noise from the agility dogs (in the same area) and spectators, and obedience rings were moved into a ballroom down a hall, etc.... People complained the room was too warm and dogs weren't doing well on the plastic sheets/tarp laid out on the floor to protect the carpet... <= and fast forward to today, no more obedience trials for these clubs.
Obedience was already very low on their list of priorities obviously. They seriously expected dogs to perform on sheets of plastic and tarps? I imagine that people stopped entering after that.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
41 - 60 of 69 Posts
Top