rabble rousing - Golden Retrievers : Golden Retriever Dog Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-06-2009, 05:21 PM Thread Starter
Preeminent Member
 
hotel4dogs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SW of Chicago
Posts: 20,917
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Thanks: 25,922
Thanked 19,784 Times in 7,723 Posts
rabble rousing

Just to start a discussion going here...(the opinions herein are not necessarily those of the management, or even mine)
I heard an opinion last night that the hunt/field trainers have gotten so good that it's hurting the retrieving breeds.
This person said that because the trainers are so good, the breeders don't need to improve the dogs, or even produce particularly good ones (this was followed by a lengthy explanation of what "good" means, including soft mouth, tractability, calm disposition, etc) because whatever they produce can be corrected by a decent trainer.
Comments??



CH Rosewood Little Giant VCD3 UDX VER RA TDX MHU SH MXP MJP MFP T2BP DJ VCX WCX CCA CGC FFX-OG (born 3-10-2007), also UCH HR UH UUD AN UJJ URO1 UHIT a.k.a. "Tito" (the Tito Monster)

waiting at the bridge:
My first dog, and my most special girl
Gibson's Golden Girl, CD, CGC, TDI ( 3-20-1997 - 11-22-2013) a.k.a. "Tiny", "Queen B"
and my heart dog
Gibson's Golden Guy, CD, CGC, TDI ( 01-31-1998 - 01-02-2012) a.k.a. "Toby", "HRH"
hotel4dogs is offline  
post #2 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-06-2009, 08:50 PM
Supreme Member
 
Lucky's mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tulsa, Ok
Posts: 6,129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Images: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Well, I don't hunt. I don't train. Me and Lucky....we're just couch potatos.

Now that my credentials are out of the way, I will offer my opinion.

No, I don't think you can replace innate drive and ability with super training. There is a joy and intensity within a dog doing something he was born good at.
Lucky's mom is offline  
post #3 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-06-2009, 08:58 PM
Supreme Member
 
Lucky's mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tulsa, Ok
Posts: 6,129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Images: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
I might ad that I do think a soft mouth is pure training...whether it be learned when its with its puppy sibling or learned by a trainer. I personally don't think a soft mouth is dependent on a gene.

Last edited by Lucky's mom; 02-06-2009 at 09:03 PM.
Lucky's mom is offline  
post #4 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-06-2009, 11:48 PM
Humankind. Be both.
 
FlyingQuizini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 7,650
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 745 Times in 329 Posts
I consider myself a pretty good trainer (not field specifically - just commenting in general). I still want to start with the best piece of clay possible. IMO, it would be a great disservice to the breed if breeders were to start "getting lazy" b/c they felt the trainer could "fix" anything that wasn't attempted to be bred into the dog.

Besides, they can't *really* control (at least not with great accuracy) which traits will come and go with "sloppy" breeding. You end up with a dog that lacks drive, for example, and that will be a very difficult thing to "train" into the dog.

All in all, I think that's a very poor argument.

"Saber" (Golden Retriever) Born 5/12/12, Adopted April 2014.
Wordsmith's Winsome Warrior
No titles (I'm too lazy now!), but an awesome hiking partner!

"Quiz" (Golden Retriever) 12/31/03 - 3/20/13
U-CD Tanbark's Number Two Pencil, JH, CDX, Can-CD, AX, AXJ, OF, RS-E, JS-E, GS-E, WCDex.
I loved being this dog's partner! Watch him shine!

"Zoie" (Whippet) 9/8/00 - 3/28/14
Donmar-Valair Second Wind, CD, RE, MC, ASCA-CD, Th.D.
#1 AKC Obedience Whippet for 2004 / AKC and ASFA FCH Pointed
FlyingQuizini is offline  
post #5 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-07-2009, 12:43 PM
Member
 
Tatnall's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 149
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 86 Times in 49 Posts
In some ways, I think that the skill and success of the great trainers in the field game lead to a requirement for better breeding, not make it less important--particularly in FTs. As the training has gotten better and it has become more difficult to choose between dogs, the various tests at trials have gotten tougher. Distances are longer, concepts tougher, etc. A dog who is not well bred simply won't stand up to the physical and mental demands placed on them.
Tatnall is offline  
post #6 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-08-2009, 08:20 PM
the party's crashing us
 
K9-Design's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gatorcountry
Posts: 4,117
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 4,194 Times in 1,991 Posts
This sounds like someone I wouldn't want training MY dog :-)
You hear this argument also from the anti-e-collar crowd...that the e-collar has produced fire-breathing, bird-chomping rock-brains rather than, I suppose, the popping bank runners touted as "British-trained."
There are no training methods that make up for a non-biddable, unintelligent, non-birdy retriever.
Advancements in training methods allow the trainer to better communicate to the dog, and a dog with good breeding can flourish under good methods.
--Anney
K9-Design is offline  
post #7 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-10-2009, 10:20 PM
Barley & Mira's Mom
 
sammydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 3,489
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Images: 16
Thanks: 881
Thanked 1,045 Times in 643 Posts
I don't think that would be true. If you look at the catalogs for field trials all the Golden Retrievers have pedigrees filled with field titles, most with top level titles. If any dog could win or even compete at a field trial with a good trainer, you would see more dogs with no titles in their lines.

I have heard the saying you cannot make filet mignon out of ground beef...

Barley MACH4 PACH Barley Mar MXC MJC MXP2 MJP2 OF ADHF
Mira MACH7 Yaqui's Glenhaven Miramar RN JH MXF TQX T2B WC ADHF VC CCA
Lindy Margold Lindbergh Field Flygirl MX MXJ
http://www.margoldgoldens.com

Sammy (2004-2009) I miss you buddy
Sir Sampson Knight II AX MXJ OF EAC TG-N CL2-R CL1-F TF-I FDX CGC
sammydog is offline  
post #8 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-11-2009, 06:12 AM Thread Starter
Preeminent Member
 
hotel4dogs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SW of Chicago
Posts: 20,917
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Thanks: 25,922
Thanked 19,784 Times in 7,723 Posts
Thanks for all the replies. As I said, the opinion originally given wasn't necessarily mine. In fact, it wasn't mine at all, but I don't know enough to have counter-argued so I wanted to hear from people who do know!



CH Rosewood Little Giant VCD3 UDX VER RA TDX MHU SH MXP MJP MFP T2BP DJ VCX WCX CCA CGC FFX-OG (born 3-10-2007), also UCH HR UH UUD AN UJJ URO1 UHIT a.k.a. "Tito" (the Tito Monster)

waiting at the bridge:
My first dog, and my most special girl
Gibson's Golden Girl, CD, CGC, TDI ( 3-20-1997 - 11-22-2013) a.k.a. "Tiny", "Queen B"
and my heart dog
Gibson's Golden Guy, CD, CGC, TDI ( 01-31-1998 - 01-02-2012) a.k.a. "Toby", "HRH"
hotel4dogs is offline  
post #9 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-11-2009, 07:29 AM
Advanced Member
 
EvanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 567 Times in 307 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotel4dogs View Post
Just to start a discussion going here...(the opinions herein are not necessarily those of the management, or even mine)
I heard an opinion last night that the hunt/field trainers have gotten so good that it's hurting the retrieving breeds.
This person said that because the trainers are so good, the breeders don't need to improve the dogs, or even produce particularly good ones (this was followed by a lengthy explanation of what "good" means, including soft mouth, tractability, calm disposition, etc) because whatever they produce can be corrected by a decent trainer.
Comments??
How can I put this delicately? Rubbish!!! There! Was I diplomatic enough?

Whoever said that to you was confessing their ignorance. The requirements made of dogs in field trial competition require the finest traits in the greatest density possible.

If one trainer were to make a single stride that separated his/her dogs from all the others it may lead one to make such a stretch. But the trainers & handlers in that sport, overall, have raised the bar together over time, and will likely continue to do that. That still leaves the greater edge to the dog that brought the best genetic traits to the game in order to distinguish themselves as a consistent winner.

EvanG

"Keep away from people who try to belittle your ambitions. Small people always do that. But the really great ones make you feel that you too can become great." ~ Mark Twain
EvanG is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Golden Retrievers : Golden Retriever Dog Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome