This is why breeding should be done with many, many, many generations of full clearances, which are posted on OFA, and preferably also on K9data. Breedings should be carefully considered. We do months and months of research of pedigrees, clearances, longevity, temperament, general health, cause of death, conformation, and fitness for original purpose, going back many generations for every breeding we do. You don't look like you do any of that. Certainly, there is no indication on your website that you put any effort into ensuring healthy pups, and the missing data is cause for concern.
Oh, please. The Code of Ethics does indicate that eyes and heart should be posted publicly in a database (OFA). Prism knows what she's doing and what she has to say is accurate. Rather than take her to task falsely, perhaps you should just start complying with the Code of Ethics. It takes almost no effort and very little money, and it would make your breeding program look much better.
I know of another breeder in your general area who has faked eye and heart clearances. The only way to reassure buyers that yours are not faked is to send them into the OFA. Why wouldn't you do that? It's easy and cheap, and you get the pride of knowing your dogs' clearances are there for the world to see.
It would also be nice if you posted the registered names of your dogs and the studs you use on your website. For instance, for the litter born in November, who is Odin? Doesn't seem to be yours. When searching for puppies, how is anyone to know if Odin has clearances? Simply posting his registered name on your website would make it easy for people to verify, and then no one would be posting critical posts about your breeding program.
It's so easy to comply and make information available. You ought to do it. It makes your breeding program look better (as long as you're honestly doing the things you say you do), it gives buyers information and reassurance, and it inoculates you from criticism by people like Prism and me. Voilá! Problems solved!