I think your cause is noble and needed. Two things are going on: first is that breeders have heard such enthusiasm many times only to find that rarely does anyone ever do it right; and second, it's not as easy as you think. Would you rewire your neighbor's house without years of training? Perform a root canal? Write a book in Mandarin? Sometimes, when you have zero knowledge about a thing, it looks a lot simpler than it is. I think that's the case with dog breeding. There is actually a pretty gigantic learning curve. It's like going down a rabbit hole: it looks straightforward from the surface, but gets more complicated, more bizarre, and more requiring of expertise, intuition and judgment the farther down you go.
Let's say you're considering breeding your bitch. The stud you're considering is an ICT carrier but not affected. Can you breed to him?
Or let's say that the great-grandsire of your proposed stud (who is also the great-great-grandsire to your bitch) died at 6 years old and you don't know from what, but your stud's sire lived to 15. Will breeding to him create long-lived puppies, or short-lived? (The answer is incredibly complicated.)
Your proposed stud, Henry, is an incredible therapy dog. He's the product of Charlie (sire) and Chelsea (dam). When Charlie was bred to Clara (a different female), 4 out of 8 puppies from that litter had hip or elbow dysplasia. But Henry was from a different dam. Is it safe for you to breed to this dog?
You have a breeding you're considering. The 10-generation Coefficient of Inbreeding is 7.2, but Hank (a popular sire who died 25 years ago) is the most influential dog at 3.9%. A longtime breeder tells you that she believes she can track her line's PU back to Hank, and she's not the only one who says that. But your girl has no PU in her background (that you know of). Is this a safe breeding for you? What if the breeding had a COI of 18% but Hank was robust and healthy and lived to 16 years old with no PU, cancer or other health issues?
You've researched dozens of potential breedings and have narrowed it down to four. But of those four, in one Hemangiosarcoma is present on both sides, but most of the dogs lived a long time and were otherwise healthy. In the second, there are several missing elbow clearances in get from your stud's siblings, but none in your stud's get. In the third, the pedigree looks pretty good, but the stud is one of the most popular sires in the country (is this a good thing or a bad thing?). And in the fourth, you're satisfied with everything in the pedigree, but there are several intelligent (good), bulletproof (good) and excellent learning (good) but high energy (bad) dogs in the stud's pedigree, and you're breeding therapy dogs. Which breeding should you do?
And you just want someone to sell you a breeding female so you can breed to a boy with the four core clearances.
It's like giving the keys to a car to a three-year old. Breeders understand that you need the equivalent of a college education. It's pretty alarming when people say they just want to get a dog and start breeding. I saw one lady (from Kansas) who recently posted in another forum that she wanted to buy a Golden to breed to Korgis for therapy dogs. Yikes.
If you are truly interested, you might want to start by
clicking here to give you an introduction to breeding. It's also a good resource for knowledgeable people and sources of puppies.